The hope was short-lived. For six weeks, Wall Street had clung to a single narrative: the Iran conflict is winding down, the Strait of Hormuz reopens, oil falls back below $80, and the bull market keeps running. This morning, shortly before the US session, President Donald Trump shattered that narrative with a single Truth Social post.
Iran’s latest proposal to end the war was “TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE,” Trump wrote. The numbers tell the rest: Brent crude surged as much as 3.5 percent to $104.80 per barrel, while West Texas Intermediate climbed to near $99. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq gave up their early gains, the Dow turned slightly negative. After one of the strongest six-week rallies in recent memory, the market is suddenly back where it was in mid-April: caught in a tug-of-war between geopolitics and earnings momentum.
What Is Actually Happening in the Strait of Hormuz
The numbers are stark, and they are often underestimated in mainstream coverage. Roughly 20 percent of the world’s oil and LNG normally passes through the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman. Since late February 2026, that corridor has been effectively shut. Three months into the war, commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains at a near standstill — marking the critical waterway’s first near-complete stoppage in its recorded history, according to JPMorgan.
Goldman Sachs has put numbers on what this means for global inventories: more than 10 million barrels per day of supply lost, with global oil stockpiles down to near-record lows. JPMorgan strategists used unusually blunt language this morning, writing that the depletions are likely to “ultimately force the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, one way or another” — a notable sentence because it openly implies that markets or the military will intervene if diplomacy fails.
For investors, that captures the central tension of this week. On one side: a bull market thesis backed by a record-beating jobs report, a strong earnings season, and tech catalysts like Intel’s Apple deal. On the other: an energy shock the International Energy Agency has labeled “the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market.”
Why Inflation Comes Back Differently This Time
Memory of 2022 still runs deep, especially in Europe. But this oil shock works differently than the gas shock that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Back then, the problem was primarily European; the US market was relatively insulated. This time, it is the reverse: Asia carries most of the weight, because around 84 percent of the crude oil and 83 percent of the LNG passing through the Strait go to Asia — nearly 70 percent of the oil to China, India, Japan, and South Korea.
Europe is not exempt. Natural gas prices in the early weeks of the war surged from €30/MWh to above €60/MWh. For European industrial firms whose energy costs had only just returned to pre-war levels, that is a setback. And for investors, it means the inflation data coming this week — April CPI and PPI in the US — suddenly become market-moving events again. They will be scrutinized for how higher oil prices are feeding into broader price pressures.
Which Sectors Are in Focus
This morning’s market reaction was typical for a phase dominated by energy and geopolitics — but it was also more differentiated than some commentators suggested.
Energy names benefit mechanically. Exxon, Chevron, OMV, Shell, TotalEnergies — every integrated major is effectively a long position on Brent. At $100 per barrel and above, free cash flows for these companies are historically extraordinary. US producers benefit doubly: in April 2026, US exports of crude and petroleum products rose to nearly 12.9 million barrels per day. The United States is, in this shock, the clear relative winner among the major economies.
Tech is surprisingly resilient — but selectively so. The Nasdaq held just above yesterday’s close this morning despite a historically high correlation between oil price spikes and tech selloffs. The reason: the AI story is carrying weight. Intel jumped over 13 percent today to an all-time high of $130.57 after a Wall Street Journal report on a preliminary Apple chip deal. Qualcomm climbed 9.5 percent on strong quarterly results. The Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) has gathered $6.5 billion in assets in 36 days — faster than the Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024.
Defensives and dividend payers become more interesting. In an environment where a classic risk-off trigger can flip the script at any moment, European high-dividend strategies deserve a second look. The Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) returned 29 percent over the past year, helped by a strong euro and pound that lift overseas dividends in US-dollar terms.
Losers: energy-exposed consumer names and travel. Airlines, cruise lines, energy-intensive manufacturers — they absorb higher input costs without the pricing power of energy producers. Nintendo lost over 11 percent today, largely due to the Switch 2 price hike; but the memory chip shortage forcing Nintendo to raise prices is itself a downstream effect of the broader supply-chain stress.
What Decides This Week
Three data points and one event. April CPI and PPI from the US will show whether the oil shock is already feeding headline inflation, or whether it will hit with a lag. The ongoing earnings season delivers more data on consumer strength and margin pressure. And the diplomatic front remains the actual wildcard: Trump’s rejection today is not necessarily the final word. Both sides are struggling to maintain a fragile ceasefire following a series of flare-ups in hostilities.
For long-term investors, the right question is not “Will the market correct?” It is: “How is my portfolio positioned if oil stays here for another three months — and how is it positioned if a deal is announced tomorrow?” Both scenarios have realistic probability today.
Sam Stovall, Chief Investment Strategist at CFRA Research, put it pragmatically this morning: before the current bull market run continues, the S&P 500 may need to take some time to catch its breath.
Bottom Line
The truth is more mundane than the headlines suggest: the market is at all-time highs, valuations are ambitious, the energy shock is real, and geopolitics is providing the powder. Anyone building large new positions in this environment should plan for at least three weeks of volatility. Anyone holding existing positions should hold them exactly where they are — and treat the next, near-inevitable Hormuz headline for what it is: noise in a system that, over the long term, prices on cash flows.
Related Hubs: Macro & Rates | Geopolitics
Try TradingView Free for 30 Days
Plus get a $15 discount on your first subscription through this link.
