Broker Comparison 2026

ING vs. Interactive Brokers

Detailed comparison of all fees, features, and suitability — updated for 2026.

ING
3.5/5
vs
Interactive Brokers
4.5/5
Our Recommendation

ING is the better choice for Full-Service Bank Customers, while Interactive Brokers wins for Professionals. Which one suits you depends on your strategy — the detailed comparison below shows every difference.

Numeric Comparison
MetricINGInteractive BrokersDifference
Order fee per trade9.90 €1.00 €8.90 € cheaper at Interactive Brokers
10y savings plan cost @ €100/month1.188 €120 €1.068 € cheaper at Interactive Brokers
Interest on €10,000 cash (1 year)4.33 % = 433 €+433 € more at Interactive Brokers / year
Available exchanges51+4 more at ING
BMInsider rating3.5/54.5/5+1.0 at Interactive Brokers
Bottom line: on €10,000 cash Interactive Brokers earns about 4.330 € more interest over 10 years.

ING

3.5/5
Strengths
  • Established Full-Service Bank
  • Good Customer Service
  • Integrated Current Account
  • Free Custody Account
Weaknesses
  • High Order Fees
  • Savings Plan Not Free
Best for
Full-Service Bank Customers
Go to ING →* Affiliate link · no extra cost for you

Interactive Brokers

4.5/5
Strengths
  • 150+ Exchanges
  • Professional Tools
  • Lowest Fees for Active Traders
  • High Interest on Cash
  • All Asset Classes
Weaknesses
  • Complex Platform
  • Not Beginner-Friendly
Best for
Professionals
Go to Interactive Brokers →* Affiliate link · no extra cost for you

Detailed Comparison

All fees, products, and platform features compared side-by-side. The "Winner" column shows which broker leads in each category.

FeatureINGInteractive BrokersWinner
Fees & Costs
Order Fee4.90€ + 0.25% (min 9.90€)$0.005/Aktie (min $1) or Fixed $1Interactive Brokers
ETF Savings Plan Fee1.75%-Tie
Account Fee0€/Year0€/YearTie
Minimum Deposit0€0€Tie
Interest on Cash0%bis 4.33% (USD)Interactive Brokers
Product Range
StocksTie
ETFsTie
CryptoInteractive Brokers
OptionsInteractive Brokers
CFDsTie
Fractional SharesInteractive Brokers
Number of ExchangesXetra, Frankfurt, Direkthandel150+ Börsen in 33 LändernING
Platform & Tools
Mobile AppTie
Desktop PlatformInteractive Brokers
Demo AccountInteractive Brokers
Security & Regulation
Regulated byBaFinSEC / FCA / BaFinTie
Deposit Protection100.000€$500.000 (SIPC)Tie
Founded19911978Tie
Overall Rating
RatingInteractive Brokers

Which Broker for Whom?

Depending on your strategy and experience, one broker fits better. Here's how to decide:

For Beginners

Interactive Brokers

Low barriers, simple app, demo account and no hidden costs — perfect to get started.

More about Interactive Brokers →
For Active Traders

Interactive Brokers

Low per-order fees, many trading venues and derivatives access — important if you trade regularly.

More about Interactive Brokers →
For Long-Term Investors

Interactive Brokers

Free savings plans, interest on cash and no custody fee — what matters when you buy & hold.

More about Interactive Brokers →

Detailed Assessment

Who is ING?

3.5/5

ING offers securities trading as part of its full banking service. For customers who want checking and brokerage under one roof.

Strengths in Detail

  • Established Full-Service Bank
  • Good Customer Service
  • Integrated Current Account
  • Free Custody Account

Weaknesses

  • High Order Fees
  • Savings Plan Not Free
  • Limited Exchanges
Who is ING worth it for?

Particularly suitable for: Full-Service Bank Customers, Casual Investors, Savings Plan.

Who is Interactive Brokers?

4.5/5

Interactive Brokers is the professional's choice with access to 150+ exchanges, all product classes, and the lowest fees for active traders.

Strengths in Detail

  • 150+ Exchanges
  • Professional Tools
  • Lowest Fees for Active Traders
  • High Interest on Cash
  • All Asset Classes

Weaknesses

  • Complex Platform
  • Not Beginner-Friendly
  • No German-Language Support
  • No Savings Plan
Who is Interactive Brokers worth it for?

Particularly suitable for: Professionals, Active Traders, International Investors, Options Trading.

ING vs Interactive Brokers — German consumer bank vs global pro broker

ING (formerly ING-DiBa, 9M+ German bank customers) and Interactive Brokers (US-domiciled, founded 1978) target almost no overlapping users. ING is the mass-market German Direktbank — Girokonto, Extra-Konto, ETF savings plans, depot for buy-and-hold investors. IBKR is the global professional trading infrastructure — 150+ exchanges, multi-asset (options/futures/FX/bonds), institutional-grade pricing.

The honest framing: there are very few users who plausibly choose between these two. Most ING customers are buy-and-hold ETF investors who would get no benefit from IBKR's depth. Most IBKR customers are active traders who would find ING's depot offering too narrow. The interesting question is when a user might want both — and the answer is "almost never, except for sophisticated investors who keep their Girokonto at ING for banking simplicity and their depot at IBKR for trading depth".

When ING is the better pick

You are a German tax resident wanting steuereinfach. ING withholds 26.375 % KESt + Soli at source automatically. IBKR is not steuereinfach — manual Anlage KAP filing required for every trade, dividend, and interest payment.

You want a Girokonto + Tagesgeld + depot bundle. ING offers a complete consumer banking suite. IBKR is depot-only with no consumer banking products at all.

You want German telephone customer service in German. ING's German call centre is staffed by experienced specialists. IBKR's support is English-only and primarily ticket-based.

You hold idle EUR cash for free interest. ING's Extra-Konto pays 1.5–1.75 % standard with periodic promotional rates higher. IBKR pays USD interest at SOFR-based tier rates but only above $10 k thresholds — for typical retail EUR balances, ING is structurally cleaner.

You want EU-100k deposit protection in German banking law. ING deposits are protected by the German EdB at €100 000 per customer with the legal protections of German banking law. IBKR cash is protected by SIPC at $500 000 (higher absolute amount) but under US law — for EU residents, the ING protection is operationally cleaner.

You're a buy-and-hold ETF investor with €25 k–€100 k portfolio. ING's depot is good enough for this profile, and the bundled banking experience adds genuine convenience. IBKR's depth is wasted.

When Interactive Brokers is the better pick

You trade options actively (5+ contracts/month). IBKR offers global options markets at $0.65 per contract (or $0.15–0.55 Tiered). ING does not offer options at all. For any active options trader, IBKR is the only option.

You trade futures, FX, or bonds. IBKR offers Eurex/CME/CBOE futures, 100+ FX pairs with institutional spreads, direct corporate + government bond markets. ING offers none of these.

You trade non-European markets. IBKR routes to 150+ exchanges including Tokyo, Hong Kong, ASX, TSX, Singapore. ING routes primarily to Xetra, Frankfurt, Direkthandel, and US exchanges — limited international depth.

You hold $50 k+ in USD cash and want institutional rates. IBKR pays SOFR-based USD interest at tier rates (4.33 %+). ING pays no competitive USD interest. For users with US-dollar exposure, IBKR is structurally cheaper.

You manage capital across multiple accounts. IBKR supports sub-accounts, joint accounts, custodial accounts, and the IBKR Pro / Lite tiers. ING is single-user only.

You're a professional or semi-professional trader. IBKR's order routing, risk management tools, API, and reporting are designed for high-volume traders. ING's depot is consumer-grade.

Taxes — DACH specifics

Germany — ING is steuereinfach, IBKR is not. ING withholds 25 % KESt + 5.5 % Soli + optional Kirchensteuer at source. IBKR Germany (operated through IBIE — IBKR Ireland) does not auto-withhold. You receive an annual Steuerreport listing transactions, dividends, fees, Vorabpauschale base — but you must manually file Anlage KAP, claim Sparerpauschbetrag, calculate FX gains/losses on USD positions, and handle US W-8BEN credits. This typically requires a Steuerberater familiar with international broker statements (~€200–€500/year).

Austria — neither offers austriakonform status. Both ING and IBKR require self-reporting via Anlage E1kv on FinanzOnline for Austrian residents. Both issue annual statements; neither hand off automatic withholding to the Austrian tax authority.

Vorabpauschale 2026: ING calculates and debits Vorabpauschale automatically on January 2. IBKR reports the Vorabpauschale base in the year-end statement; manual Anlage KAP-INV filing required.

Quellensteuer on US dividends: ING credits the standard 15 % US withholding against German KESt automatically. IBKR withholds 15 % (W-8BEN filed) but does not auto-credit — you claim it yourself in Anlage KAP.

Currency-gain tracking: EUR-tax-resident clients holding USD-denominated IBKR positions trigger taxable currency gains/losses on every position close. ING EUR-only operations abstract this away.

Cost example — €100 000 active investor over 10 years

Profile: €100 000 portfolio, 8 manual orders/month at €2 000 average, monthly €500 ETF savings plan, €15 000 average idle EUR cash buffer.

ItemINGInteractive Brokers
120× savings-plan execution (1.75 %)€1 050~€100 (per-share min)
960× manual orders €2 000€9 504 (€9.90 each)~€960 ($1 each)
Venue fees (40× ~€2)€80included above
Cash interest (€15k × 10y)+€2 625 (1.75 % Extra-Konto)+€4 500 (3.0 % EUR avg)
Tax-handling cost (Steuerberater)€0~€2 500 (10y × €250)
Net 10-year cost€8 009−€940

The €8 949 difference is meaningful and almost entirely explained by ING's per-order commission gap at high trading frequency. For an 8-orders-per-month profile, IBKR is the structurally cheaper option even after Steuerberater fees.

Reduce trading to 1 manual order per month and the comparison flips: ING costs ~€520 over 10 years (12 × 10 × €4.34 incremental) plus €2 625 cash interest, IBKR costs ~€2 380 (same orders + Steuerberater fee minus cash interest). At low trading frequency, ING wins decisively because the Steuerberater fee overwhelms the small commission savings.

Verdict by investor profile

Beginner / first-time investor

Pick: ING (or better, Trade Republic). IBKR is wasted at this scale. Steuereinfach + bundled banking + €1 savings plans (Trade Republic) all serve the beginner better.

Buy-and-hold ETF investor with €25k–€100k

Pick: ING. The bundled banking is a real benefit; the depot is good enough; IBKR's depth is unused.

Active options or futures trader

Pick: Interactive Brokers. ING does not offer options or futures. For users with these requirements, IBKR is the only option.

Multi-asset / international investor

Pick: Interactive Brokers (with ING for German Girokonto). The hybrid setup — IBKR for trading depth, ING for German consumer banking — is what many sophisticated investors actually run.

USD-heavy or US-options-focused investor

Pick: Interactive Brokers. The USD-denominated IBKR account with institutional FX spreads is structurally cheaper than ING's EUR-only conversion costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common questions about ING vs Interactive Brokers.

For order fees, Interactive Brokers leads at $0.005/Aktie (min $1) oder Fixed $1, while ING charges 4.90€ + 0.25% (min 9.90€). Note: with CFD brokers, spreads add hidden cost — the lower nominal price isn't always cheaper overall.

ING is regulated by BaFin, Interactive Brokers by SEC / FCA / BaFin. Both fall under EU oversight. Deposit protection: ING 100.000€, Interactive Brokers $500.000 (SIPC).

For German/Austrian customers, language, BaFin regulation and tax-simple status often matter most. Check the 'Regulated by' and 'Languages' rows — DACH-focused brokers usually have the edge.

Neither ING nor Interactive Brokers offers free ETF savings plans. If recurring investing matters, check a savings-plan-focused broker.

Both are covered under their home regulator's deposit protection. ING: 100.000€, Interactive Brokers: $500.000 (SIPC). Securities are held in segregated accounts and protected in case of broker insolvency.

Interactive Brokers leads on cash interest at 4.33%. Watch the conditions — some brokers require a paid plan or cap the amount.

Both offer native mobile apps with good app-store ratings. Which is better depends on your needs — try both with a demo account if available.

A second broker makes sense when one offers features the other lacks (e.g. options, crypto, more exchanges). A full switch is only worth it if the cost difference or missing features are significant.

Ready to Get Started?

Sign up with the broker that fits your strategy. Both are regulated and offer a demo account to test risk-free.

Similar Comparisons

Scroll to Top
WordPress Cookie Notice by Real Cookie Banner