Shortly before the opening bell on Friday, Berkshire Hathaway released a one-page press statement and a one-page letter. Warren Buffett, 96 years old, at the company since 1965 and its chairman since 1970, is giving up the chairmanship with immediate effect. He becomes chairman emeritus, stays on the board and, as he puts it, remains a shareholder. His eldest son Howard, 71, a director since 1993, takes the chair as non-executive chairman. Susan Decker stays on as lead independent director. Greg Abel stays what he has been since January 1: the man who runs the company. That completes the succession Buffett announced at the annual meeting in Omaha on May 3, 2025, sixteen and a half months after the announcement and nine months after the handover of the chief executive job.
The market’s reaction was the real news of the day, precisely because there was none. Berkshire’s Class B shares closed at $509.77, up 0.11 percent. The Class A shares, which cost $763,600 apiece on Friday, slipped 0.04 percent. On the day the most famous investor in the world gave up the last formal post he still held, the stock moved less than the S&P 500, which gained 0.17 percent. Compare that with May 2025: when Buffett announced he would step down as chief executive, the B shares fell 5.1 percent the next trading day, from $539.80 to $512.15. The number that sits between those two dates explains why the market had nothing left to digest on Friday. Since May 2, 2025, the last close before the announcement, Berkshire stock has lost 5.6 percent. The S&P 500 has gained 34.5 percent over the same stretch, from 5,686.67 to 7,650.50. Forty percentage points in sixteen months. The Buffett premium did not leave on Friday. It left in installments.
One page, three sentences that matter
Buffett’s letter to shareholders is short, and it is written the way his audience has known for sixty years: family first, then the number, then the point. He recently celebrated his 96th birthday, he writes, with a great-grandchild who had just turned one. “He’s moving a bit faster than I am these days.” Then Greg Abel: “My expectations for him were sky high from the start, and he has exceeded them. He has been making the decisions that matter for some time now, and I have not had to think twice about any of them.” So the timing, he says, is right to complete the transition.
The sentence quoted most on Friday was the one about his son: “Greg runs the company; Howard will guard its culture and values – both worth more than anything on our balance sheet. Think of Howard as a policy the shareholders own and hope never to claim against.” Howard has been a director for 33 years, “a longer apprenticeship than I served before taking the reins at the age of 34.” And at the end, the line that made the headlines: “Father Time always wins. He has, however, been generous with me.”
The insurance metaphor is not an accident, and it deserves to be taken literally. A policy you hope never to claim against is a policy against a specific risk. The risk a family chairman with no operating role insures against is not a bad quarter. It is the scenario in which a future management team, an activist or a board under pressure wants to touch Berkshire’s structure: break up the conglomerate, pay out the cash, sell subsidiaries Buffett once bought with a promise never to sell them. Howard Buffett, and this is the point, has no experience running a large company. Cathy Seifert of CFRA called that a shortcoming of the succession plan on Friday: in other family dynasties the heir is usually embedded in day-to-day operations, and “Howard Buffett doesn’t have that.” Buffett would answer that this is exactly the design. The chairman is not supposed to run anything. He is supposed to stop anyone else from remodeling the house.
What the market has actually repriced since May 2025
The 40-point gap to the S&P 500 since the announcement can be broken into parts, and the parts are more instructive than the sum. One part is plain sector rotation. The index has drawn most of its gains since May 2025 from semiconductors, software and the hyperscalers, and Berkshire owns little of that beyond its Apple stake and, since June, its Alphabet stake. A second part is the cash. A company holding a third of its market value in short-dated Treasuries cannot keep up in a rally. And the third part is what analysts have called the Buffett premium for years: investors’ willingness to pay more for the same earnings because Warren Buffett allocates the capital.
That third part can be measured. Berkshire has earned roughly $48 billion in operating profit over the past four quarters, excluding the swings in its equity portfolio that the company itself calls “usually meaningless.” At a market value of about $1.09 trillion, calculated from 1,431,693 Class A equivalents at midyear and Friday’s price, that is about 23 times operating earnings. Strip out the $365 billion in cash and Treasury bills on the balance sheet at June 30 and the operating businesses trade at roughly 15 times. That is no longer a premium. That is the price you pay for a collection of insurers, a railroad, utilities and industrial businesses when you no longer know the capital allocator or do not yet trust him. The book-value math says the same thing: $522,396 per Class A share at June 30, up 12.5 percent year on year, puts Friday’s price at 1.46 times book. Berkshire itself paid about 1.45 times the prior quarter’s book value for its own shares in the second quarter. The company, in other words, is buying itself at exactly the price the market put on it Friday. Buffett always treated buybacks as a statement about intrinsic value. Abel signed that statement in the second quarter with $4.5 billion.
Abel’s first nine months, in numbers
The letter praises Abel, and the numbers explain why. Berkshire reported $12.98 billion in operating earnings for the second quarter, up 16 percent from a year earlier. For the first half it was $24.3 billion, up 17 percent. Part of that is currency gains on debt denominated in yen, euros and pounds, $575 million in the first half, after the same position produced a $1.59 billion loss in 2025. Excluding that effect, first-half growth was about 6 percent. Solid, not spectacular, and it comes after a 2025 in which operating earnings slipped from $47.4 billion to $44.5 billion.
The segments tell different stories. Insurance underwriting earned $1.73 billion in the quarter, down 13 percent, as premiums soften after several record years. Insurance investment income fell from $3.37 billion to $3.06 billion, a direct consequence of the Fed’s 2025 rate cuts, which reduced the yield on the Treasury bill pile. BNSF, the railroad, earned $1.56 billion, up 6 percent, with a further improvement in its operating ratio but still more than 500 basis points behind Union Pacific on profitability. Berkshire Hathaway Energy earned $891 million, up 27 percent. And the catch-all manufacturing, service and retailing group jumped 24 percent to $4.47 billion, mostly because of OxyChem, the chemicals business Berkshire bought from Occidental for $9.4 billion in early January and consolidated for its first full quarter.
More important than the earnings is what Abel did with the cash, because that was the question the stock had been hanging on since May 2025. The answer is unambiguous: he is spending it. At March 31 the pile of cash and Treasury bills stood at a record $397.4 billion. At June 30 it was $365.5 billion, or $359.2 billion net of unsettled purchases. In between sit $23.5 billion of stock purchases against $3.7 billion of sales, the first quarter in nearly three years in which Berkshire was a net buyer of equities. The largest item was $10 billion of Alphabet, $5 billion of Class A stock at $351.81 and $5 billion of Class C at $348.20, taken directly out of the $80 billion equity raise Alphabet used in early June to fund its AI build-out. Alphabet closed Friday at $349.54, so the position sits almost exactly at cost. Add $4.5 billion of buybacks, 478 Class A shares for $350 million and 8.6 million Class B shares for $4.2 billion, after $235 million in the first quarter and six straight quarters with no repurchases before that. After the quarter closed came the acquisition of homebuilder Taylor Morrison, $72.50 a share in cash, $6.8 billion in equity value and $8.5 billion in enterprise value, a 24 percent premium, completed July 24 and meant to fold the 15 regional builders of Clayton Properties Group into a single national platform. In his first shareholder letter in February, Abel wrote that many observers had read Berkshire’s cash position as a retreat from investing. “It does not.” Three quarters later he has proved it, with roughly $30 billion of acquisitions and stakes and nearly $5 billion of buybacks.
The Fed hike as a silent ally
There is an irony in the timing that almost nobody mentioned on Friday. Two days before Buffett stepped back, the Federal Reserve raised its policy rate for the first time since July 2023, to 3.75 to 4.00 percent. For most companies that is bad news. For a company holding $365 billion in Treasury bills it is a raise. Every quarter point on that pile is roughly $900 million a year in pre-tax interest income. The decline in insurance investment income in the second quarter, from $3.37 billion to $3.06 billion, was the bill for last year’s cuts. The bill for the hike arrives from the fourth quarter on, and it has the opposite sign.
That is also why Berkshire fell 2.04 percent on Thursday, the day after the Fed decision, alongside the banks and insurers, and did not fall further on Friday. The market traded Berkshire as a financial stock, not as a Buffett stock. On a triple-witching Friday, 12.5 million B shares changed hands, three times a normal day’s volume, and the price moved 57 cents. Anyone who wanted to sell because Buffett was leaving found someone who wanted to buy because rates are rising and Berkshire lives on them. That is a healthy setup for a stock, but an unfamiliar one: it is being priced on its balance sheet, not on its chairman.
The succession nobody voted on
The change in the chair is the visible succession. The invisible one has been running since 2006 and is accelerating. As of the proxy statement in March, Buffett held 196,317 Class A shares, equal to 13.7 percent of the economic interest and 30.2 percent of the voting power. The gap comes from the share structure: a Class B share carries one fifteen-hundredth of a Class A share’s economic interest but only one ten-thousandth of its vote. Every conversion from A to B, and conversion runs only in that direction, destroys voting power. In July, Buffett converted 8,000 A shares into 12 million B shares and gave them away, worth about $6 billion, to the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation and his three children’s foundations. What remains, roughly 188,000 A shares worth about $144 billion at Friday’s price, is to be fully donated by December 31, 2034, according to his own timetable.
That is the succession that matters for shareholders, and it has little to do with Howard Buffett’s title. Spread over eight years, about $17 billion of Berkshire stock a year will flow to foundations that must sell it to spend it. Against a $1.1 trillion market value and $5 billion of buybacks in a half year, that is absorbable. But the voting block that has anchored Berkshire’s governance for six decades dissolves on schedule. By the mid-2030s Greg Abel will run a company in which no single shareholder holds a blocking stake, and at that point Howard Buffett’s insurance policy will be the only structural bulwark left. Buffett anticipated this in his final Thanksgiving letter as chief executive last November: “Ruling from the grave does not have a great record, and I have never had an urge to do so.” Instead he has installed a chairman whose job is to do exactly that while he is alive, and children who allocate the capital while they still can.
What it means for American shareholders
Berkshire sits in millions of American brokerage accounts, 401(k)s and IRAs as something between an index fund and a family business, and Friday is a good day to check which of the two you actually own. The case that survives Buffett’s departure is the structural one. Berkshire pays no dividend and, on everything Abel has said so far, will not start. For a taxable account that means the only tax event is the one you choose, when you sell, and the compounding inside the company runs without an annual haircut. That argument has nothing to do with Buffett’s person and it came through Friday intact. So did the balance sheet: a third of the market value in Treasury bills that now yield more than they did a quarter ago, an insurance float of $177.5 billion that costs less than nothing when underwriting is profitable, and operating businesses that earned $48 billion over the past year.
The case that does not survive is the one that treated the stock as a proxy for its manager. The annual report’s table since 1965 shows Berkshire compounding at roughly 20 percent a year against roughly 10 percent for the S&P 500 with dividends. That table is Buffett’s, and no successor will be judged by it. Since 1990, Berkshire has finished a year 10 or more percentage points behind the index nine times and beaten the index the following year in seven of them. But the two exceptions, 2003 and 2019, show there is no schedule, and 2026 would be the first lagging year in the table’s history with someone other than Buffett in the chief executive’s chair. Berkshire trailed in 2025 as well, returning about 11 percent against 18 percent for the index. Two straight years behind would be the first such stretch in more than two decades. For anyone holding BRK.B instead of an S&P fund because of the man in Omaha, the question is no longer whether Buffett is worth the premium. There is no premium. The question is whether Abel earns one.
American investors also have a closer precedent than the European family holdings the structure resembles. When General Electric moved from Jack Welch to Jeffrey Immelt in 2001, the market kept paying a Welch premium for years before concluding that the conglomerate’s earnings had been manufactured by financial engineering and the culture had not survived the founder’s departure. The comparison is unfair to Berkshire on the accounting, which is conservative to a fault, and fair on the structure: a sprawling conglomerate, a legendary allocator, a hand-picked successor and a board that must decide whether the parts belong together. GE had no policy against a breakup. Berkshire now has one, and it is 71 years old and named Howard.
The counter-argument
Friday’s calm can be read differently, and it should be. First, the 40-point gap since May 2025 says as much about the index as about Berkshire. An S&P 500 carried by semiconductors and AI capital spending is the hardest possible benchmark for a conglomerate of insurers and railroads. Second, the company is in better operating shape than in 2025, with earnings rising, buybacks resumed and a rate environment that rewards its balance sheet. A stock that stands still for a year while earnings grow is cheaper at the end of the year than at the start. Morningstar puts fair value at $765,000 per Class A share and $510 per Class B share, essentially Friday’s close. Third, and this is the argument against this article’s own thesis: perhaps the Buffett premium was never as large as the legend says, and the lag since May 2025 is simply what happens when a third of the market value sits in cash and the rest in old-economy holdings while the market celebrates a technology rally. In that case Friday confirmed nothing that was not already on the balance sheet.
Fourth, there is the risk the policy is written against, and it should not be waved away because Buffett phrased it elegantly. A 71-year-old non-executive chairman whose expertise is farming, food security and landmine clearance presides over a board that, from the mid-2030s, will have no anchor shareholder. Should Abel stumble, or the stock trail the market for a decade, someone will look at $365 billion and make a proposal. Whether a policy denominated in culture holds against that, nobody knows, because it has never been claimed against. Brian Jacobsen of Annex Wealth Management said on Friday that Buffett had made “a graceful exit” and that it “was always a matter of when, not if.” That is true of the chairman. It is not yet known to be true of the premium.
What to watch
The question Friday answered was whether Berkshire without Buffett at the head of the board moves a stock. The answer is no, and that is the best news a successor can receive. The question that remains open is how Berkshire is valued without the premium Buffett brought with him. Three markers help. The first is the buyback: if Abel keeps buying at 1.45 times book in the third and fourth quarters, he puts a floor under the level the market tested on Friday. That number arrives in early November. The second is insurance investment income, which from the fourth quarter must reflect the Fed hike; if it stays below $3 billion, either Berkshire has spent the cash faster than expected or the market has the rate math wrong. The third is the annual meeting in May 2027, the first not chaired by Warren Buffett but by his son, and the first that will show whether 40,000 people still come to Omaha to listen to Greg Abel.
Buffett wrote in November that he was “going quiet, sort of.” He kept his word: Friday’s letter is one page long and the only number in it is his age. For a man who spoke in numbers for sixty years, that is the clearest statement of all. The numbers now belong to Abel. The culture belongs to Howard. And the stock belongs, for the first time since 1965, to a market that values it without a premium and decided on Friday that this is not a reason to sell.
Try TradingView Free for 30 Days
Plus get a $15 discount on your first subscription through this link.
